Web Design Glasgow

Web Strategy Blog

I recently had to setup a search facility on a website driven by SQL Server 2005 Express. My natural choice was SQL Server’s Full-Text Search feature, but setup was not entirely intuitive, and the web was full of misinformation. I’ve put together a tutorial to save you time.

If you’re not sure if your have Full-Text installed, read my post on installing SQL Server 2005 Express Full-Text Search.

Once, Full-Text is installed, managing your index is actually very simple:

  • Browse to the tables of your database, right click and select ‘Design’
  • In the main window, right click and select ‘Fulltext Index…’
    If you see the message, ‘You need to define one or more full-text compatible indexes on the table to create a full-text index’ and the ‘Add’ button is greyed out, it’s because you don’t have a column the database can use to uniquely identify each row. Make sure you have a primary key, and if you’ve no success, start your troubleshooting with this video - it discusses unique indexes about 1/3 of the way through.
  • Otherwise, click ‘Add’, and you have a new index.
  • To configure the columns in the index, click the ‘…’ button next to ‘Columns’
  • For each column, select the column, and select the appropriate language
    To understand why the language parameter is important, see my post on use of the FORMSOF and INFLECTIONAL keywords in SQL Full-Text Search

It’s that easy! Any questions, let me know and I’ll do my best to help.

del.icio.us:SQL Server 2005 Express Full-Text Search Setup Tutorial digg:SQL Server 2005 Express Full-Text Search Setup Tutorial spurl:SQL Server 2005 Express Full-Text Search Setup Tutorial furl:SQL Server 2005 Express Full-Text Search Setup Tutorial reddit:SQL Server 2005 Express Full-Text Search Setup Tutorial fark:SQL Server 2005 Express Full-Text Search Setup Tutorial Y!:SQL Server 2005 Express Full-Text Search Setup Tutorial magnolia:SQL Server 2005 Express Full-Text Search Setup Tutorial

It is often hard for those needing a website to justify the costs of design. Design is often viewed as a ‘talent’ before a learned skill, and as something that we either have or we don’t, and it naturally follows that if you ‘have it’ should be able to produce it without greart expensive.

Luke Wroblewski gave an excellent presentation at the An Event Apart 2007 conference (Chicago) that helps communicate the complexity and process of design, and the value a strong design can contribute.

Luke’s presentation focuses on the web form, which is any interface that accepts user input - common examples are login/registration, enquiry, and eCommerce checkout forms. It’s clear that many businesses depend upon their customers completing these forms to generate, maintaining and convert leads, and logically follows that the quicker and easier a form is to complete, the more likely those customers will do so.

Luke presents three simple variants of webform design to demonstrate the potential impact on revenue the design of the form can have. Each form input field has a label that tells the customer what information to put in that field. Luke’s variations placed the label above the field, and to the left of the field, either left-aligned or right-aligned. His referenced studies found that customers completing forms with right-aligned labels surprisingly did so twice as quickly as those with left-aligned labels, but that quicker still were those customers completing forms with top-aligned labels.

Clearly, big differences can be made to conversion rates by assessing the quality of your web form. Luke’s presentation is available on his blog, and goes on to discuss the consideration of required/optional fields, primary/secondary actions, contextual grouping and progressive disclosure, tabbing, the path to completion, inline validation and assistance, and feedback mechanisms.

He also provides excellent example of both good and bad web forms in a very accessible presentation that will ensure you know what to expect when commissioning the design of a web form.

del.icio.us:Communicating the ROI of Web Design with Web Forms digg:Communicating the ROI of Web Design with Web Forms spurl:Communicating the ROI of Web Design with Web Forms furl:Communicating the ROI of Web Design with Web Forms reddit:Communicating the ROI of Web Design with Web Forms fark:Communicating the ROI of Web Design with Web Forms Y!:Communicating the ROI of Web Design with Web Forms magnolia:Communicating the ROI of Web Design with Web Forms

I’ve just been struggling to enable full-text search on my installation of SQL Server 2005 Express Edition, and so want to share the solution.

If, like me, the ‘Use full-text indexing’ checkbox was greyed out under Database > Properties > Files, you first need to test whether Full-Text Indexing is installed or not. To do this, execute the query.

use [dbname]
select fulltextserviceproperty(’isfulltextinstalled’)

If this returns 0, you need to install Full-Text Search.

Firstly, did you install SQL Server 2005 Express Edition Advanced Series? Only the Advanced Series contains full-text. If not, you may need to reinstall.

However if so, then you just need to change the installation to include Full-Text Indexing. But if you originally installed from a download from the above link (most of you) then you’ll find that when you try to modify the installation via Control Panel > Applications / Programs, Windows prompts you for the installation file ’sqlrun_sql.msi’. This is because the download unpacked the installation files to a temporary folder which can no longer be found.

To resolve this issue, you need to download the file again from the link above, move it to a folder, and unzip (I used WinRAR). Then point Windows to the sqlrun_sql.msi file (under /setup, wherever you unzipped the download) when it prompts you for the installation file.

For additional info, see here.

For additional support setting up Full-Text Search once installed, watch this video on the topic from Micosoft, BUT I think you’ll find my new tutorial on seting up Full-Text Search in SQL Server 2005 Express much quicker and more intuitive to be honest..

del.icio.us:SQL Server 2005 Express with the Full-Text option greyed out digg:SQL Server 2005 Express with the Full-Text option greyed out spurl:SQL Server 2005 Express with the Full-Text option greyed out furl:SQL Server 2005 Express with the Full-Text option greyed out reddit:SQL Server 2005 Express with the Full-Text option greyed out fark:SQL Server 2005 Express with the Full-Text option greyed out Y!:SQL Server 2005 Express with the Full-Text option greyed out magnolia:SQL Server 2005 Express with the Full-Text option greyed out

These statistics source from a compilation of SERPS behaviour studies for which I’ve listed source information at the end of the article. If you disagree with a figure, or have additional figures or sources, please do post them to the discussion.

  1. 42% of search users click the top-ranking link. 8% click the second-ranking link, and the click-through rate (CTR) continues to drop thereof.
  2. When these two top-ranking links are artificially switched, the click-through ratio of 42-8% drops to 34-12%, demonstrating the importance of engaging copy in addition to rank position.
  3. 62% of search users click a link on the first page of search results
  4. 23% of searches progress to the second page. Presumably the difference between 62% ans 23% stems from searchers trying either another keyword or another engine, or giving up.
  5. 80% f unsuccessful searches are followed with keyword refinement.
  6. 41% of searches unsuccessful after the first page choose to refine thir keyword search phrase or their chosen search engine.
  7. 77% of search users choose organic over paid listing when searching, 67% choose organic search when purchasing.
  8. When the searcher is purchasing, organic click-through generates 25% higher conversion rates than equivalent Pay-Per-Click (PP) click-through.
  9. 40% of SEO campaigns aware of their ROI achieve returns in excess of 500%, while only 22% of PPC campaigns were able to achieve this value.
  10. Daily use of search engines rose from 33% in 2002 to 59% in 2005. The average day in 2005 reported 60 million people using a search engine. As of March 2007, Google accounts for 64% of US searches and 77% of UK searches

The validity of these statistics depend on various experimental factors (i.e. large, representative samples of searchers/searches), and on accurate statistical analysis.

For more in depth analysis, the sources for this article were:

Please post addition figures or sources, or your view, in the comments.

del.icio.us:10 statistics that demonstrate the value of SEO digg:10 statistics that demonstrate the value of SEO spurl:10 statistics that demonstrate the value of SEO furl:10 statistics that demonstrate the value of SEO reddit:10 statistics that demonstrate the value of SEO fark:10 statistics that demonstrate the value of SEO Y!:10 statistics that demonstrate the value of SEO magnolia:10 statistics that demonstrate the value of SEO

The latest figures on Google’s market share compared to its primary search competitors Yahoo, MSN, and Ask (formerly Ask Jeeves) have been published by Hitwise. As always, the numbers are astounding, revealing that Google holds a 77% market share, meaning overthree quarters of UK internet searches are made through Google. Yahoo is now holding 8%, and while MSN and Ask are both at 5% and falling.

March 2007 UK Search Market Share

Comparing the UK to the US figures, for which Google has just broken 66.6% or two thirds market share, it’s clear that UK internet searchers even more than US searchers turn first to Google.

A collective 23% is not to be sniffed at, but clearly firms services the UK market and requiring SEO services should look first to SEO specialists with strong results in google.co.uk.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

del.icio.us:UK Google Market Share - March 2007 digg:UK Google Market Share - March 2007 spurl:UK Google Market Share - March 2007 furl:UK Google Market Share - March 2007 reddit:UK Google Market Share - March 2007 fark:UK Google Market Share - March 2007 Y!:UK Google Market Share - March 2007 magnolia:UK Google Market Share - March 2007
« Previous PageNext Page »

Categories

Popular

Archive

Add to Technorati Favorites